Everest Property & Casualty Insurance’s capital increase of 80 million yuan has been promoted for 9 months but has not yet been implemented. When will the Class C risk rating be removed?

Log in to Sina Finance APP and search [Xinpi] to view more evaluation grades Source: Blue Whale Finance Since the first quarter of 2022, the comprehensive risk rating of Everest Property Insurance has been downgraded from B to Category C, and the solvency is not up to standard.

(Picture source: Visual China) After the announcement of a change in registered capital was disclosed in July 2023, and the registered capital was planned to be changed from 1 billion yuan to 1.08 billion yuan, Everest Property & Casualty Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as \”Everest Property & Casualty Insurance\”) ) There has been no news of progress on this matter.

Nine months later, on April 24, the company disclosed another relevant announcement, but the content was not that the capital increase was approved, but that the board of directors reviewed and approved the \”Proposal on Review of the Supplementary Plan for the \”New Capital Plan\”\” , the original capital increase amount remains unchanged, and some matters are supplemented to promote the implementation of subsequent capital increase matters.

At the same time, Everest Property & Casualty Insurance stated that in accordance with the relevant requirements of the \”Notice on Further Strengthening the Disclosure of Equity Information of Insurance Companies\”, other matters will be disclosed after the capital increase is further determined.

For Everest Property & Casualty Insurance, increasing capital and replenishing blood is a top priority.

Established in May 2016, Everest Property & Casualty Insurance is registered in Lhasa, Tibet.

Looking back, Everest Property & Casualty Insurance has experienced many setbacks since its establishment. In 2018, it was suspended for a month due to improper classification of product attributes and other issues, and then was suspended again for a month due to unfavorable handling and rectification of relevant responsible persons.

During the same period, Everest Property & Casualty Insurance fell into management turmoil.

In 2018, Everest Property & Casualty Insurance fired President Li Geng from his post. It was reported that the dismissal was due to \”infighting\” between the company and then-chairman Chen Kedong.

One year later, Chen Kedong resigned, and Ren Xiancheng served as the interim head of the Everest Property & Casualty Insurance Board of Directors. This was extended three months later, and Peng Xifeng was appointed as the interim head of the management layer to act as president. It was not until 2020 that Peng Xifeng was officially appointed as general manager. batch.

The position of chairman has always been acting on behalf of the company. In 2022, the board of directors of Everest Property & Casualty Insurance was reshuffled and director Wang Jian has been acting as chairman.

In terms of performance, Everest Property & Casualty Insurance has always been in the red from its establishment to 2021.

In 2022, Everest Property & Casualty Insurance made a profit for the first time, with a net profit of 5.353 million yuan. However, in 2023, Everest Property & Casualty Insurance suffered a loss again, with a net loss of 15.7626 million yuan for the year.

In terms of premiums, there has been no breakthrough. Insurance business income in 2023 was 565 million yuan, which was not much higher than the 416 million yuan in the first full year of 2017.

Starting from the first quarter of 2022, the comprehensive risk rating of Everest Property & Casualty Insurance will be transferred from B to Category C, and it will be included in the queue of insurance companies with substandard solvency standards.

At that time, Everest Property & Casualty Insurance stated that in order to reduce risks, it would focus on improvements in the relatively weak aspects of liquidity risk and operational risk.

In terms of liquidity risk, we have strengthened the collection work for premiums and accounts receivable, and cash flow has turned to positive inflows by the end of the half year; in terms of operational risk methods, we have focused on improving corporate governance and capital utilization issues, focusing on promoting the capital increase work. conduct.

As of the latest comprehensive risk rating, that is, in the third quarter of 2023, Everest Property & Casualty Insurance\’s rating is still Category C.

According to a notification from the regulatory authorities, the risks of Everest Property & Casualty Insurance in the third quarter are mainly reflected in: First, the solvency adequacy ratio of capitalizable risks is reduced and endogenous capital is insufficient; second, the insurance business line risks in operational risks have increased compared with the previous quarter, mainly The reasons are that the sales staff turnover rate is high, the proportion of underwriting and claims underwriting staff who have worked for more than three years is low, and the development deviation rate of reported outstanding claims reserves is 7.16%, which is a large deviation; thirdly, reputational risk has increased compared with the previous quarter. .

Everest Property & Casualty Insurance also proposed improvement measures accordingly.

In terms of capitalizable risks, we will continue to improve the solvency adequacy ratio by strengthening accounting operations and promoting capital increase and share expansion.

In terms of operational risks, the management and training of sales personnel will be strengthened to improve the retention rate of underwriting and claims personnel.

In terms of reputational risks, we urge the rectification of events that trigger public opinion.

In terms of corporate governance, we will continue to promote follow-up work on the capital increase.

As of the end of the fourth quarter of 2023, the core and comprehensive solvency adequacy ratios of Everest Property and Casualty Insurance were both 130.12%, the comprehensive ratio was 109.37%, the investment return rate was 3.53%, and the comprehensive investment return rate was -0.03%.

Like (0)
Previous April 25, 2024 5:04 pm
Next April 25, 2024 5:04 pm

Related posts

  • FTX: Almost all customers can get their funds back

    Nearly all customers of bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange FTX will be able to get their funds back and more, according to a court filing

    US stock news May 8, 2024
  • Chengyi Pharmaceutical: Net profit will increase by 0.81% year-on-year in 2023, with plans to send 2 yuan per 10 pieces

    Chengyi Pharmaceutical (603811) disclosed its 2023 annual report on April 26. In 2023, the company achieved operating income of 672 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of 2.54%; net profit attributable to the parent company was 163 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of 0.81%; non-net profit after deducting 155 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of 10.6%; net cash flow generated from operating activities was 195 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of 17.38%; during the reporting period, Chengyi Pharmaceutical’s basic earnings per share was 0.5 yuan, and the weighted average return on net assets was 14.35%. The company\’s 2023 distribution plan is: It plans to distribute 2 yuan (tax included) to all shareholders for every 10 shares.

    US stock news April 25, 2024
  • ICICI Bank stock surges over 2% after strong Q4 results

    Shares of ICICI Bank hit a lifetime high on the NSE at ₹1,136.90 on Monday’s trade after the company’s March quarter consolidated net profit grew 18.5 per cent to ₹11,672 crore, helped by lower provisions. The stock was trading at ₹1,138.85 on the NSE, higher by 2.79 per cent as of 11.53 am.

    US stock news April 29, 2024
  • 515 Investor Protection | Credit-based elective courses? Simulated investment challenge? GF Fund’s “Integration of Industry and Education” Investor Education Project Creates Characteristic Investment and Education Business Card

    Special Topic: Sina Finance’s 2024 Investment Education Case Selection is in Progress Sina Finance’s “2024 Investment Education Excellent Case Selection” activity was officially launched on April 8. GF Fund’s “Integration of Industry and Education” investor education project was selected for the “Excellent Practice Award for Investment and Education Projects” category. >>Event details It is reported that GF Fund established an investor education base in October 2021, focusing on investor education, focusing on improving investors’ knowledge reserves and cognitive levels, and building a reputation for investment education services. In recent years, offline investment education activities in the public fund industry have mostly been lecture-based, with obvious characteristics of fragmentation and homogeneity. After in-depth research, there are many points of convergence between the development needs of \”industry-education integration\” in colleges and universities and the \”one company, one province, one university\” investment and education activities of GF Fund. This can be used to build the \”industry-education integration\” project of GF Fund, which can enter universities to carry out long-term in-depth investment. cooperate. This project breaks the limitations of fragmented investment education, systematically outputs…

    US stock news April 25, 2024
  • Are investors losing patience waiting for rate cuts? FOMO may be the big theme this year!

    Investors appear to be getting impatient waiting for rate cuts

    US stock news 5 days ago
  • Bank of America lowers Intel target price: chip foundry market share is too low

    BofA Securities last week lowered its price target on Intel stock to $44 per share from the previous price of $50 per share, while maintaining a neutral rating on the stock. Prior to this target price adjustment, Intel conducted a re-segmentation of its business, which resulted in a change in the valuation method of the company’s IDM (vertical integration from chip design to production) business, including products and foundry services. . A report from Bank of America Securities pointed out that Intel’s future depends largely on CEO Pat Gelsinger’s vision to transform the chip company into a semiconductor foundry and compete with other companies in the industry. However, Bank of America analysts commented on Intel’s current situation that although Intel’s foundry business has made some achievements in external design, it still relies heavily on the company’s internal design team. This dependence has prompted the valuation of the IDM business to shift to a comprehensive assessment. approach rather than evaluating each part individually. Therefore, the new price target set by Bank of America this time is 23 times the expected price-to-earnings…

    US stock news April 15, 2024